A
Albert I
Milpostista
Verificad@ con 2FA
Pues con la traducción gana en morbo
exacto y no deja muy bien a algunas grandes marcas
a continuación esta la traducción al english
esto es una traducción del texto donde explica su forma de puntuar del original en danes:
Estimate of the original producer and their works'=of art quality I have, to the best of one's ability, tried to grade-give producers and works of art, judging from their horologiske ability, on a scale from 1-10. In other words, to estimate their product's general quality. Then there is the question just how I define quality? I appreciate high finish/manufacture-quality and technically rafinered solutions. I haven't taken height for præsicion and durability in the assessment. Mechanical clocks are long ago surpassed by quartz-unclean with regard to præsicion and an each plastic digital clock tolerate far more beatings than even the most tough mechanically clock. Therefore the focus lies in the assessment on the producer's subject knowledge and the finish. The grading scale takes starting point in Swiss mechanical works of art. I.e. in order just gaining the grade (1) ordinary ”tavelige” it means horologisk quality, which lies nicely over ordinary ”tavelige” China-works. The assessment is my personal opinion judging from self-owned experiences and the tendencies I through the years' races have found normatively for what "the experts" consider finer horologi. The assessment is to therefore only be taken like a guiding estimate from me and nobody else. Thus the list is read Only an-given the producer's name of the work, it ebauch is ebauch ached are based on. A "X" points out a value from 1-9 or from A-Z. "X" is include the places, where there are several variants (with different complications) of the work, but where there is mention of the same basisværk. The grade (1-10) afterwards producer-name and factory name are my estimate on a scale from 1-10, where 10 are best. The grade is based on the producer's done work after their modifications. Thus producers, who make extensive modifications on simple works of art, well, can do gain a nice character.
exacto y no deja muy bien a algunas grandes marcas
a continuación esta la traducción al english
esto es una traducción del texto donde explica su forma de puntuar del original en danes:
Estimate of the original producer and their works'=of art quality I have, to the best of one's ability, tried to grade-give producers and works of art, judging from their horologiske ability, on a scale from 1-10. In other words, to estimate their product's general quality. Then there is the question just how I define quality? I appreciate high finish/manufacture-quality and technically rafinered solutions. I haven't taken height for præsicion and durability in the assessment. Mechanical clocks are long ago surpassed by quartz-unclean with regard to præsicion and an each plastic digital clock tolerate far more beatings than even the most tough mechanically clock. Therefore the focus lies in the assessment on the producer's subject knowledge and the finish. The grading scale takes starting point in Swiss mechanical works of art. I.e. in order just gaining the grade (1) ordinary ”tavelige” it means horologisk quality, which lies nicely over ordinary ”tavelige” China-works. The assessment is my personal opinion judging from self-owned experiences and the tendencies I through the years' races have found normatively for what "the experts" consider finer horologi. The assessment is to therefore only be taken like a guiding estimate from me and nobody else. Thus the list is read Only an-given the producer's name of the work, it ebauch is ebauch ached are based on. A "X" points out a value from 1-9 or from A-Z. "X" is include the places, where there are several variants (with different complications) of the work, but where there is mention of the same basisværk. The grade (1-10) afterwards producer-name and factory name are my estimate on a scale from 1-10, where 10 are best. The grade is based on the producer's done work after their modifications. Thus producers, who make extensive modifications on simple works of art, well, can do gain a nice character.
thanks for sharing Santi
